Buy Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made (Vintage) by Genovese, Eugene D. (ISBN: 9780394716527) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.
AFTER HIS DEATH last year at the age of 82, most obituaries of Eugene Genovese — the historian of American slavery whose masterpiece, Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made, was published in 1974—stated that he traveled from left to right, from Marxism to conservatism.These questions abound in the most seemingly esoteric debates of Civil War historiography, in, for example, the debate between Kenneth M. Stampp and Eugene Genovese over the economic character of American slavery, in Thomas Haskell’s and David Brion Davis’s debate over abolitionist motives, in the difference between a focus on political.Eugene D. Genovese, an eminent historian who challenged the traditional portrait of slavery in the antebellum South with the prize-winning book “Roll, Jordan, Roll” and whose early-life.
Eugene D. Genovese, one of the foremost left-wing scholars of his time, has died. A teenage member of the Communist Party kicked out for “having zigged when I was supposed to zag,” he gained national notoriety in 1965 for welcoming “the impending Viet Cong victory” at a Rutgers teach-in.
Slavery was the central, and virtually the only cause of the war. If the Negro had not been brought to America, the Civil War would not have occurred. Because the North and the South held views on the issue of slavery that were both irreconcilable and unalterable, the conflict was inevitable.
The book reads more like an extended essay about Genovese's interpretation than an objective study. Genovese sees the pre-Civil War South as a paternalistic society whose paternalism was a European ideology adopted by the slave-holders and accepted by the slaves as it gave them a protector from harsh slave laws. However, acceptance (he argues.
Genovese sees the pre-Civil War South as a paternalistic society whose paternalism was a European ideology adopted by the slave-holders and accepted by the slaves as it gave them a protector from harsh slave laws. However, acceptance (he argues) deprived the slaves of the initiative to change their lives through revolt, as in Brazil. He regards paternalism as a pre-capitalist, pre-industrial.
Eugene D. Genovese. Eugene Dominic Genovese (born May 19, 1930) is an award-winning and noted historian of the American South and American slavery.He has been noted for bringing a Marxist perspective to the study of power, class and relations between planters and slaves in the South.
The Churches, Slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction: A Review Essay Recent studies make clear how deeply engaged Presbyterians were in the nineteenth-century debates over slavery, the Civil War; and Reconstruction. by James H. Moorhead Religion and the Antebellum Debate over Slavery. Edited by John R. McKivigan and Mitchell Snay. Athens.
Radical History Review 88 (2004) 4-29 Few historians have left their mark on a field as decisively as Eugene D. Genovese. The shape of southern history, particularly slavery studies, would look.
Eugene Dominic Genovese (born May 19, 1930) is an American historian of the American South and American slavery. He has been noted for bringing a Marxist perspective to the study of power, class and relations between planters and slaves in the South. His work Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made won the Bancroft Prize.
Eugene Genovese died Wednesday morning, passing away in his hospital bed at home after a long battle with heart disease. When I sat with him the night before and clasped his hand, he blinked his.
Did Slavery Destroy the Black Family? Essay. 1592 Words 7 Pages. Show More. In this debate, the discussion will surround whether or not slavery destroyed the Black family. A family is a social unit living together and people descended from a common ancestor. The debate focuses on Wilma A. Dunaway who posits that slavery did destroy the Black family, and her opponent, Eugene D. Genovese, who.
Slave Narratives and the Civil War by Michael E. Woods For a century after emancipation, historians of U.S. slavery relied almost exclusively on sources written by white people.
Genovese identified with the traditionalist camp of historians by seeing the Civil War (which he preferred to call the War for Southern Independence) as an irrepressible conflict, a clash of one civilization with another. “I begin,” he declared, “with the hypothesis that so intense a struggle of moral values implies a struggle of world.
Genovese joined together theories of social life derived from Marxism with a sharp reading of the archives of American slavery. He thereby overturned many of the inherited scholarly understandings of the South and the Civil War developed in the century after emancipation.
He called the Civil War the War for Southern Independence. He castigated those who saw the slaveholding South “as the citadel of the Devil.” “The fact is the South embodies much that’s at the core of Western civilization,” Mr. Genovese said in an interview with The New York Times in 1998. “If it has become at times the embodiment of.